Don’t sweat the Madrid Protocol Central Attack
It’s long been thought that one weakness of this centralised system is “Central Attack”. This is where the home registration is attacked (within five years of the international application date), the whole house of cards, which is built upon that home registration, may come tumbling down.
The Ghosts of Nice 11’s Past, Present and Future
An attorney’s insight into the Nice 11 system, or as we like to call it a two-dimensional system in a three-dimensional world!
To Madrid or not Madrid #2: What about the Goods and Services?
Goods and services specifications are key when you’re deciding if Madrid is the right option for your client’s trademark filing. As we mentioned in our last post, filing through Madrid should not be an automatic decision, and the specific mark is an important consideration.
The Madrid Protocol: To Madrid or not Madrid? Why the mark itself matters
At Sortify.tm we think about the ins and outs of filing trademark applications around the world every day (after which we typically enjoy an in-house brewed craft beer)! If there’s one rule of thumb we have for filing internationally via the Madrid Protocol – it is that there is no rule of thumb. We don’t always recommend using Madrid and we don’t always recommend NOT using Madrid.
EUIPO Harmonised data update - October 2018
EUIPO October updates published
- EUIPO has published its October 2018 review results
- 152 additions
- 9 deletions
New Zealand - "Featuring" gets removed from pre-approved services
IPONZ removes 700+ services that include the word "featuring"
- IPONZ updates pre-approved goods and services database to remove the word "featuring" from retail and wholesale services
- Objections had been raised despite the "featuring" services being in the IPONZ pre-approved goods and services databases
- A corresponding practice note should be published soon